Skip to main content

Dark Night of the Soul (3)

There are really two distinct phases to the "dark night of the soul" or "the passive night of spirit" as St. John more precisely defines the stage.

In my own terminology this relates to the deep negation of the formal supra-rational structures providing the intellectual framework for the (circular) holistic appreciation of reality.

And as concrete perceptions have their roots in such deeper formalised structures, it likewise entails the continuing negation of holistic super-sensory perception.

All this of course presupposes the substantial negation through the active nights of earlier (linear) analytic structures both perceptual and conceptual.

So overall this stage leads insofar as is possible for the individual involved to the substantial negation of all conscious activity so that one is left operating more and more from pure faith.


Now there are huge psychological dangers associated with this journey (which from my experience are not dealt with properly in the spiritual literature). As we shall see shortly, though severe depression is only too likely due to the extremely arduous nature of the stage, these problems have I believe been greatly compounded through a faulty representation of the unconscious dynamics involved.

Paradoxically though the trials of the "dark night" may be most dramatic in its earliest phase, one is not as likely to suffer depression at these times. This is due to fact that the ego - which is not yet fully tamed - is able to provide the vigour and enthusiasm to keep going.

So there is still a conviction at these times that despite all the difficulties that a deep underlying spiritual meaning is to be found in the darkness.

Thus the first phase relates to the negation of the more externally based supra-rational structures.


I remember in my own case that this process went on for at least two years. During the first year there was a continual longing to obtain some relief (in the form of spiritual light) which never came.

So after another year of constant darkness, I reached a certain acceptance of the state and was able to settle into a routine, still carrying out daily activities in normal fashion (though of  a somewhat restricted nature). I was also attuned to periodically receiving in a passive manner precious mystical touches (communicated to the intellect or alternatively the will) that reassured me of being on the right path.

It is then that the focus turns gradually to the internal structures that still enjoy some conscious independence.

I have read many accounts of the dark night where scrupulosity becomes a major issue, so that. the spiritual aspirant keeps going over decisions again and again seeking some kind of moral reassurance.

Perhaps I can explain why this is the case!

Because conscious light has been largely taken away by now from external activity, the only area where any remaining ego sense can be experienced is in the taking of moral decisions.

One's only security therefore now lies (with everything else seemingly lost) in being fully faithful to one's conscience.

This can lead to an excruciating scenario where one is constantly faced with what might be called "the marginal decision". In other words, though such a decision may relate to the small minutiae of one's daily activities, one feels compelled to conscientiously weigh up the pros and cons in a prolonged manner before taking a certain action.

Eventually a faint intuitive signal is received in faith to take a certain course. In this sense the immediate problem is resolved and one thereby can remain faithful to conscience. However one is then quickly faced with taking another tantalising decision, with an even more prolonged wrestling required. So like a weight lifter trying to raise even greater loads above his head, one is faced with this Sisyphean task of daily battling with one's conscience.

What actually happens here is that the faint internal light (still remaining with respect to decision-making) now undergoes steady erosion due to the continual negation of internal structures driving one ever deeper into the unconscious regions of personality.

So eventually the faint light by which one exercises decisions fades completely and one no longer can enjoy any reassurance that one is doing right.

Thus one is now left alone in the dark with the growing conviction that one has completely lost one's way.


It is in the very nature of the stage that other developments at this time tend to conspire to greatly compound one's difficulties.

Because one may now have been engaged for several years in an unrelenting journey of great psychological severity, one can be on the verge of emotional and physical exhaustion.

External events are also likely to turn against one. I remember at this time that my father suddenly died (which was a significant blow). Also I started experiencing growing problems in terms of maintaining employment.

It also became increasingly difficult to avoid coming under closer scrutiny from family, friends and colleagues who began to detect that I seemed somewhat withdrawn and depressed.

However though they meant well in urging behaviour similar to everyone else, this in fact created more isolation than ever. For I was now in total darkness with no means of re-establishing customary contact with the world. Also, in being totally restricted to this amazingly congested underworld of darkness, I experienced unspeakable anguish and grief that was simply impossible to communicate.

The true crisis point was now arriving!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dark Night of the Soul (7)

We return here to providing a holistic mathematical perspective on the "dark night" stage. As we have seen the first level of the 3rd band (of which the "dark night" is the final and most important stage) is defined in terms of 2-dimensional interpretation. Thus starting with the dualistic phenomenal distinctions (that characterise the 1st dimension) one then attempts to approximate as close as possible growing nondual spiritual awareness through a process of dynamic negation of attachment to all conscious symbols. So this dynamic negation of conscious phenomena constitutes the 2nd of these two dimensions. So we posit conscious phenomena in a linear dualistic manner (+ 1). We then unconsciously negate such phenomena in a circular nondual manner (  – 1). Such positing and negating in experience leads to an ever increasing dynamic interaction as between the external (objective) and internal (subjective) aspects of experience. In this way, ever more refined d

Transcendence and Immanence

As we have seen, Level 2 (Band 3) - which I typically refer to as the Point Level - is geared to the unfolding of the imaginary polarities relating to the true relationship (without reductionism) as between whole and part. Once again, it comes in two complementary forms. From the transcendent perspective, the collective whole (as quantitative) uniquely mediates the universal spirit (as qualitative). From the complementary immanent perspective, each individual part (as quantitative) again uniquely mediates the universal spirit (as qualitative). Thus from these two related perspectives, the spirit is mediated both through (collective) whole and (individual) part phenomena. In this way, through both quantitative aspects being related to spirit in a complementary fashion, whole/part reductionism is thereby avoided. Whole/part reductionism - as we have seen - consists of interpreting both wholes and parts with respect merely to their quantitative characteristics (with the whole in a

4-Dimensional Reality

In holistic mathematical terms, the structures of Level 2 (Band 3) can be characterized as of a 4-dimensional nature from a qualitative perspective. Now we all accept in conventional scientific terms the quantitative importance of 4 dimensions (with our macro world seemingly structured in this manner). However an equal (though largely unrecognised) importance attaches to 4 dimensions from a qualitative perspective (with again everyday reality seemingly structured in this fashion). These the 4 qualitative dimensions correspond indirectly (in a reduced quantitative manner) with the four roots of 1 i.e. + 1,  − 1, + i and − i respectively. Now we have already dealt with the significance of the two real (horizontal) roots in the context of 2-dimensional interpretation.  Again, in dynamic relative terms, these refer to the interaction of external (objective) and internal (subjective) polarities (which necessary underlie all experience). As we have seen, these horizontal polarities