Skip to main content

Information and Transformation

Around this time, i.e. with respect to the Null Level (Band 3, Level 3), an equivalent form of the holistic "Theory of Everything" already outlined began to clearly form in my mind.

This version is explicitly based on the binary system, which is now given both the customary analytic (Type 1) and largely unrecognised holistic (Type 2) mathematical interpretations.


In analytic terms, the binary digits, 1 and 0 are defined as clearly separate and thereby independent of each other, in an absolute manner.

As is well known, all numbers can be encoded in a binary digital manner. For example, if we take the number 13 (defined in the conventional denary manner), to illustrate, this can equally be expressed as 1101 (in binary terms).

One of the great benefits of the binary system - widely used in computer technology - is that potentially all information can be successfully encoded in an (analytical) binary digital manner.

Indeed the remarkable advances of information technology, that so define our present age are intimately based on this use of the binary digital system.


However, what is not at all clearly recognised is that the same two digits 1 and 0 can equally be given a coherent holistic interpretation where ultimately they are understood as completely interdependent - and thereby fully identical - with each other. It can then be seen that potentially all transformation processes can likewise be encoded through the same two digits.

This holistic digital notion in fact lies at the heart of mystical religion, where the ultimate spiritual experience of reality is often viewed in paradoxical terms as a plenum-void i.e. an overall unity (1) that is equally a nothingness (0) in phenomenal terms . Put another way 1 (as the representation of all form) is here seen as identical with 0 (as the representation of emptiness).

Traditionally perhaps in Western culture, more emphasis has been placed in the mystical traditions on the notion of spiritual oneness (as the perfection of all form), whereas in the Eastern traditions more emphasis in turn has been placed on the notion of the creative void (as the potential for all form).

However, ultimately in varying degrees,  these two aspects are seen as necessarily complementary with each other (in both traditions).


So 1 and 0 can be used in a more systematic manner as the dynamic basis of all transformation processes, especially with respect to human development.


Here 1 is closely associated with the corresponding geometrical notion of the line (as 1-dimensional), whereas 0 in turn is likewise closely associated with the circle (the centre of which, as a point is 0-dimensional).

Then the holistic notion of 1 (as linear logic) is based on the clear separation of polar opposites in experience, leading to unambiguous absolute notions of truth; the holistic notion of 0 (as circular logic), which is based on the dynamic complementarity of opposites, by contrast leads to paradoxical relative notions of a truth that ultimately is purely ineffable (in phenomenal terms).

In my own model of development, I have interpreted all stages (bands, levels sub-levels etc.) in a holistic binary fashion (based on 1 and 0).

In this context 1 is, holistically, closely associated with the notion of differentiation, and 0 with integration respectively  For example, before development commences, 1 cannot be separated from 0, so we cannot yet speak meaningfully of either differentiation or integration with respect to experience.


The first main task of development, which culminates then at Band 2 is to achieve successful differentiation with respect to the various structures. Though integration also necessarily takes place, in effect it is thereby heavily reduced to differentiation. This is especially the case for example in relation to our understanding of both Mathematics and Science.

So in holistic terms, this represents the specialisation of 1, which is associated in extreme fashion with rigorous rational interpretation of an abstract kind.


The next task, which rarely is achieved in a sustained manner, is the corresponding specialisation of  0. This is identified especially with the pure contemplative extreme of continuous spiritual awareness of a refined intuitive nature. In my model, Band 3 represents the journey towards such realisation, whereas consolidation then takes place at Band 4.
Thus is holistic terms, this relates to the specialisation of 0 (as pure intuitive awareness).


The final main task is then to successfully harmonise both 1 with 0  (leading to the continual interpenetration of material form with spiritual energy). I refer to this as radial activity, which is associated with Bands 5, 6 and 7 in my model.


The great problem with present culture, as I see it is that with the growing emphasis on information technology it is in danger of becoming completely unbalanced.

In other words, more and more emphasis is being placed on the ability to generate ever greater amounts of information in society.


However the corresponding means through which authentic transformation can take place, in personal and social terms, is all but completely ignored. As we have seen this entails an entirely distinctive interpretation of symbols that is holistic - rather than analytic - in nature.

This imbalance is thereby likely to lead to an increasing fragmentation in economic, political, social and ecological terms, culminating in  a series of significant crises. Only then will the major factor at work that most of all is typified by our current scientific and mathematical notions be properly addressed.


 Thus with respect to the binary system, we really have 3 stages.


1) Information - based on the clear analytic separation of 1 and 0.


2) Transformation - based on the two-way holistic interdependence of 1 and 0.


3) Information and Transformation - based on the combined separation and interdependence of 1 and 0.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Modes of Development (9)

We have looked now briefly at the modes of development both with respect to the primary "colours" (cognitive, affective and volitional) and the many - and somewhat arbitrary - list of secondary modes (i.e. "multiple intelligences"). And we have seen that as far as successful integration of the personality, the primary modes are vital. In fact the complete mature development of the personality requires that cognitive, affective and volitional be both differentiated successfully in a sequential manner with respect to each of the major bands (and accompanying levels) on the spectrum, while also being simultaneously integrated with each other. Now, while imbalances are indeed possible with respect to development of the three primary modes (up to and including Band 5), the final two radial bands would however require a high degree of integration with respect to all three modes. As we have seen, in terms of the secondary manifestations, a person may show special ...

Nature of Addition and Multiplication

The two aspects of the number system that I have identified i.e. Type 1 and Type 2 respectively, are intimately related to the distinction as between addition and multiplication. To see this clearly, I concentrate on - what I refer to as - pure addition and pure multiplication. Pure addition simply relates to the successive adding of 1 to the previous unit (starting with 1). Pure multiplication by contrast relates to the successive multiplication by 1 of the previous unit (again starting with 1). In this way, we are enabled to generate both the Type 1 and Type 2 aspects of the number system. Thus through addition of 1 we obtain, 1 1 , 2 1 , 3 1 , 4 1 , ...... So in this Type 1 aspect, the base are the natural numbers, which are all defined with respect to the (default) dimensional number of 1. This defines the conventional mathematical approach to numbers where the natural numbers - and indeed all reals - are represented as lying on the (1-dimensional) number lin...

Two Meanings of Bardo

The transition between Band 5 (level 3) and Band 6 (level 1) can be referred to as a bardo which resembles very closely indeed Buddhist notions of the transition as between death and rebirth. Now according to the Tibetan tradition this represents the state of existence as between two lives on Earth. Of course this presupposes the doctrine of reincarnation in its somewhat literal sense, to which I personally would not subscribe. However accepting the traditional accounts, the question arises as to how precisely this transition as between death and rebirth (in a new body) takes place. So on the one hand after death there is the clearest spiritual experience of reality of which one is capable which then gives way to terror arising from one’s previous sinful inclinations. So we have here in starkest form the battle as between the “higher” and “lower” aspects of the self. And the manner in which this is resolved then plays a key role in determining the nature of one’s next...